vfork
NAME
vfork - create a child process and block parent
SYNOPSIS
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h> pid_t vfork(void);
#include <unistd.h> pid_t vfork(void);
DESCRIPTION
Standard Description
(From SUSv2 / POSIX draft.) The R vfork () function has the same effect as fork(2), except that the behavior is undefined if the process created by R vfork () either modifies any data other than a variable of type pid_t used to store the return value from R vfork (), or returns from the function in which R vfork () was called, or calls any other function before successfully calling _exit(2) or one of the exec(3) family of functions.Linux Description
R vfork (), just like fork(2), creates a child process of the calling process. For details and return value and errors, see fork(2).R vfork ()
is a special case of
clone(2).
It is used to create new processes without copying the page tables of
the parent process.
It may be useful in performance sensitive applications
where a child will be created which then immediately issues an
execve(2) .
R vfork ()
differs from
fork(2)
in that the parent is suspended until the child makes a call to
execve(2)
or
_exit(2).
The child shares all memory with its parent, including the stack, until
execve(2)
is issued by the child.
The child must not return from the current function or call
exit(3),
but may call
_exit(2).
Signal handlers are inherited, but not shared.
Signals to the parent
arrive after the child releases the parent's memory.
Historic Description
Under Linux, fork(2) is implemented using copy-on-write pages, so the only penalty incurred by fork(2) is the time and memory required to duplicate the parent's page tables, and to create a unique task structure for the child. However, in the bad old days a fork(2) would require making a complete copy of the caller's data space, often needlessly, since usually immediately afterwards an exec(3) is done. Thus, for greater efficiency, BSD introduced the R vfork () system call, that did not fully copy the address space of the parent process, but borrowed the parent's memory and thread of control until a call to execve(2) or an exit occurred. The parent process was suspended while the child was using its resources. The use of R vfork () was tricky: for example, not modifying data in the parent process depended on knowing which variables are held in a register.CONFORMING TO
4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001.
The requirements put on
R vfork ()
by the standards are weaker than those put on
fork(2),
so an implementation where the two are synonymous is compliant.
In particular, the programmer cannot
rely on the parent remaining blocked until a call of
execve(2)
or
_exit(2)
and cannot rely on any specific behavior wth respect to shared memory.
NOTES
Linux Notes
Fork handlers established using pthread_atfork(3) are not called when a multithreaded program employing the NPTL threading library calls R vfork (). Fork handlers are called in this case in a program using the LinuxThreads threading library. (See pthreads(7) for a description of Linux threading libraries.)History
The R vfork () system call appeared in 3.0BSD. In 4.4BSD it was made synonymous to fork(2) but NetBSD introduced it again, cf. http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/kernel/vfork.html . In Linux, it has been equivalent to fork(2) until 2.2.0-pre6 or so. Since 2.2.0-pre9 (on i386, somewhat later on other architectures) it is an independent system call. Support was added in glibc 2.0.112.BUGS
It is rather unfortunate that Linux revived this specter from the past.
The BSD man page states:
"This system call will be eliminated when proper system sharing mechanisms
are implemented.
Users should not depend on the memory sharing semantics of
R vfork ()
as it will, in that case, be made synonymous to
fork(2).\c
"
Details of the signal handling are obscure and differ between systems.
The BSD man page states:
"To avoid a possible deadlock situation, processes that are children
in the middle of a
R vfork ()
are never sent
SIGTTOU
or
SIGTTIN
signals; rather, output or
R ioctl s
are allowed and input attempts result in an end-of-file indication."
