No MS je vskutku „vstricny“ – ale kym jeho ustretovost vychadza z tlacenia do zmluv o ochrane, tak mi to pripomina praktiky vypalnikov :-/
Preco by vlastne bolo treba uzatvarat take zmluvy, ako uzavrel s Novellom, ak by MS nemal zle umysly?
Inak, tu zmluvu si odporucam poriadne precitat. Je to sice „pravnictina“ ale vychadza mi z toho, ze sa jedna o infikovanie Linuxu ich technologiami, ale vakcinu podame iba niektorym.
Toto sa tyka vyvojarov ktory to robia ako bezodplatne hobby:
This pledge is personal to You and does not apply to the use of Your Original Work by others or to the distribution of Your Original Work by You or others
Ak tomu dobre rozumiem, zakazuje pouzivanie a dalsie sirenie modifikovanej aplikacie a uplne popiera GPL. Sam si naprogramuj a sam mozes pouzivat. Pekna ochrana, ze?Ostatni, su chraneny iba pod podmienkou, ze sa kod stane sucastou enterprise SuSE:but only if, and to the extent, (i) Your Original Work becomes part of SUSE Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop or SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, and (ii) You ensure that as a result of Your contribution, openSUSE.org, and all further recipients of Your Original Work, do not receive any licenses, covenants or any other rights under any Microsoft intellectual property. This pledge is personal to You and does not apply to any use or distribution of Your Original Work by others
Uverim, az uvidim – mozu sa napriklad pripojit k Open Invention Network.
Co sa tyka Oracle, ich ustretovost je racionalne podlozena tym, ze vela ich zakaznikov pouziva databazy pod linuxom. Myslim, ze by ich dost nasr…li
– Maros
