Hlavní navigace

Názor k článku Google blokuje domain fronting, ztížil tím situaci cenzurovaným službám od Noah777 - Nasel jsem to: TAXES FOR REVENUE ARE OBSOLETE Beardsley Ruml,...

  • Článek je starý, nové názory již nelze přidávat.
  • 21. 4. 2018 9:35

    Noah777 (neregistrovaný)

    Nasel jsem to:

    TAXES FOR REVENUE ARE OBSOLETE
    Beardsley Ruml, January, 1946, American Affairs
    Mr. Ruml read this paper before the American Bar Association during the last year of the war [World War II]. It attracted then less attention than it deserved and is even more timely now, with the tax structure undergoing change for peacetime. His thesis is that given (1) control of a central banking system and (2) an inconvertible currency, a sovereign national government is finally free of money worries and need no longer levy taxes for the purpose of providing itself with revenue. All taxation, therefore, should be regarded from the point of view of social and economic consequences. The paragraph that embodies this idea will be found italicized in the text. Mr. Ruml does not say precisely how in that case the government would pay its own bills. One may assume that it would either shave its expenses out of the proceeds of taxes levied for social and economic ends or print the money it needs. The point may be academic. The latter end of his paper is devoted to an argument against taxing corporation profits. --- Editor.

    The superior position of public government over private business is nowhere more clearly evident than in government's power to tax business. Business gets its many rule-making powers from public government. Public government sets the limits to the exercise of these rule-making powers of business, and protects the freedom of business operations within this area of authority. Taxation is one of the limitations placed by government on the power of business to do what it pleases.
    ....