Hlavní navigace

Názor ke zprávičce Kritika objektového programování: je to katastrofa? od atarist - Je to uzávěr, ne funkce s vnitřním stavem...

  • 23. 7. 2019 22:38

    atarist

    Je to uzávěr, ne funkce s vnitřním stavem (interně nějaká struktura s funkcí a ukazatelem na její okolí, což mimochodem komplikuje vůbec základní způsob práce s těmito strukturami).

    Jinak to myslíš a píšeš dobře, jen nepoužíváš správnou terminologii a lidi se na to chytají (a mají taky pravdu).

    Nechme ale mluvit klasika nejklasičtějšího:

    The venerable master Qc Na was walking with his student, Anton. Hoping to
    prompt the master into a discussion, Anton said "Master, I have heard that
    objects are a very good thing - is this true?" Qc Na looked pityingly at
    his student and replied, "Foolish pupil - objects are merely a poor man's
    closures."

    Chastised, Anton took his leave from his master and returned to his cell,
    intent on studying closures. He carefully read the entire "Lambda: The
    Ultimate..." series of papers and its cousins, and implemented a small
    Scheme interpreter with a closure-based object system. He learned much, and
    looked forward to informing his master of his progress.

    On his next walk with Qc Na, Anton attempted to impress his master by
    saying "Master, I have diligently studied the matter, and now understand
    that objects are truly a poor man's closures." Qc Na responded by hitting
    Anton with his stick, saying "When will you learn? Closures are a poor man's
    object." At that moment, Anton became enlightened.