Ja som z toho trochu vedla. Doteraz slackware pouzival 2.4.x jadro a 2.6.x v testing/extra/experimental, ci ako sa to vola. Ani sa nenadame, vide RC1, o chvilocku RC2 a teraz FINAL verzia. Nezrychlili to tak trochu? A este mi nesedi jedna vec. Preco preboha presli az na 2.6.21.x? Ked napriklad debian ma v etchi 2.6.18.x. Fakt mi to nesedi a osobne by som na slackware 12 nepresiel, keby slapem na 11. A okrem ineho 2.4.x aspon nebol bordel ako je 2.6.x, ale na druhej strane musim uznat, ze zlepsenie je hlavne ohladne multimedii atd.
jestli to nebude tim ze slackware pouziva vanilla jadra a ne ty overpatched zmrseny hruzy co ostatni, a taky tim ze pouzitelny 2.6.x jadra sou az tak od te 20ky. Dokonce bych si tipl, ze nebude problem dal provozovat 2.4.x.
Ja som to myslel trosku inak. Vyvojari slackwaru doteraz pouzival ako default jadro 2.4.x a zrazu skok na 2.6.21. Nic proti tomu, len sa trosku cudujem :)
No v 11.0 jsem pouzival 2.6.17 z extra, takze to na 2.6.21 az takovy skok nebude. Vsak starsi vydani jsou docela dlouho podporovany, pokud se nepletu. Takze neni problem pockat a kdyz to pujde bez problemu, tak povysit. Jinak je pro me oproti ostatnim distribucim rozhodujici predevsim ta stabilita a jednoduchost. Doufejme, ze se natom nic nemeni.
Mon Nov 20 14:31:25 CST 2006
Thanks to everyone who provided valuable feedback on the question below. It
looks as if Slackware -current (future 12.0?) is going to charge into 2.6-only
territory, but it will be a conservative "charge". :-) The overwhelming
consensus is that the 2.6 series is now more than stable enough for production
use. Some folks expressed concern over the loss of Linux 2.4.x compatibility,
but they were a definite minority. Some suggested maintaining two -current
branches -- one following 2.4 and the other 2.6. The solution that'll be
taken concerning 2.4.x will be to make Slackware 11.0 better maintained than
simply security updates. It should see some other non-security updates as
well (perhaps the introduction of an /updates directory?), and will be a long
lived OS for those who swear by the stability of the 2.4.x kernel series.
Meanwhile, 2.4.x compatibility features (such as the, er, mess? going on in
the startup scripts) will be steadily eliminated in -current to focus on the
best possible 2.6.x support. With a lot of work, we should be able to make
the next Slackware release an excellent choice for both servers and desktops.
Again -- thanks for all the input! :-)
ono 2.6 bylo distupny uz pomerne douho, ja osobne jsem ho mel myslim uz pod 10tkou.. takze tak nejak ke dvoum letum? a hlavne do Slacku nebyl nikdy poblem nacped jadro jakykoli jen chces (vanilla samozrejme)
Mam ted dovku, ale pokud se nemylim, tak v praci mam Slack11 s vanilla 2.6.16 na i965. Na prvni pokus a bez problemu. A urcite Slack 10.2 i 11 na i945 s ruznyma vanilla rady 2.6. Taky v pohode. Vsechno na Dellech.