Aha, tak toto
jsou vedecke metody. Vis, kdyz fyzik vyvine „metodu“ mereni, ktera
v 16 z 18 pripadu bude produkovat zcela irelevantni data bez jakekoliv
vypovidajici hodnoty, tak se mu ostatni vysmeji. Kdyz totez udela psycholog, tak
to je „vedecka metoda“.
A abych to nejak uzavrel, tak bych jeste jednou citoval:
Rorschach proponents sometimes express surprise, dismay, or irritation that
their inkblots excite strong controversy among research-oriented clinical
psychologists. However, the reason is not hard to find: From the time of Lee J.
Cronbach, Hans Eysenck, and Joseph Zubin up until the present,
legitimate scientific criticisms of the test have been adamantly
resisted or ignored by Rorschach proponents (for a historical summary,
see Wood, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, & Garb, 2003). So long as
proponents continue to dismiss legitimate criticism, ignore negative research,
and present the test as the psychological equivalent of medical imaging
techniques, the Rorschach is destined to remain on the fringes of psychological
science.