Vlákno názorů k článku
Quad9: DNS s blokáciou nebezpečných adries
od Cotototo - "Secure" DNS jsou tady desetiletí, třeba comodo, google...
-
Nebudem sa vyjadrovat k comodo, ale google sa netvari, ze by robil nieco viac nez uplne zakladny filter tych najpreflaknutejsich pruserov. V tomto by som to s quad9 asi neporovnaval. Priamo v dokumentacii najdete len: "In addition, Google Public DNS may not resolve certain domains if we believe this is necessary to protect Google’s users from security threats."
Co sa tyka tej druhej strany mince, tak opat nekomentujem comode, iba google. V tomto smere som bol ich podmienkami velmi milo prekvapeny, kedze v zasade tvrdia, ze: "In the permanent logs, we don't keep personally identifiable information or IP information. We do keep some location information (at the city/metro level) so that we can conduct debugging, analyze abuse phenomena. After keeping this data for two weeks, we randomly sample a small subset for permanent storage. We don't correlate or combine information from our temporary or permanent logs with any personal information that you have provided Google for other services."
Da sa povedat, ze v tomto smere su tie podmienky velmi podobne tym co predklada aj Quad9. Pravo na zmenu bez upozornenia samozrejme nechyba. Urcite, kym v pripade Googlu sa najdu jedinci co budu aj tak o ich deklarovanych umysloch pochybovat, v pripade IBM & Co je pomerne jasne, ze si nemaju dovod spinit ruky a povest pochybnymi praktikami.
