Vlákno názorů k článku Blender experimentuje s přechodem z YouTube na PeerTube od Koniec monopolu - D tube je známejšia služba, mala by fungovať...
-
Koniec monopolu (neregistrovaný)
D tube je známejšia služba, mala by fungovať na princípe odmeňovania tvorcov cez crypto.
Aby mali peniaze na odmeňovanie tak potrebujú uživateľov, ktorým dajú reklamu.
Kedže reklamu musi zabezpečiť spoločnosť od nejakých sponzorov, tak si myslim že taký d tube má väčšiu šancu, Peertube je takisto zaujimavá alternatíva. - možno bude/už funguje rovnak.Možno by mohli poriešiť veci ako 18+ spôsobom nejakého predplatného, mám na mysli že by si zaregistrovaný uživateľ zaplatil ak by chcel vidieť takýto obsah, došlo by k odfiltrovaniu takéhoto obsahu, ale na druhu stranu ak by takáto služba spolupracovala s nejakou službou ako napríklad coinpayments.net, teda s nejakým crypto, novinári by to určite očiernili, pretože Google by im niečo za to ponúkol.
Naopak také predplatné by mohlo podporovať odmeny pre tvorcov, teda by ich viac motivovalo.
-
nobody (neregistrovaný)
daval sem link nahore, ale pastnu to zde z nej radeji cele ;-)
Why does PeerTube use the ActivityPub federation protocol? Why not IPFS / d.tube / Steemit?
PeerTube uses ActivityPub because this federation protocol is recommended by the W3C and is already used by the federated social network Mastodon.IPFS is a great technology, but it still seems very (too!) young for large scale streaming of large files.
After discussing it on our forum, we feel that d.tube is not free or open source, because publishing only compiled code hinders freedom of modification.
D.tube is based on Steem for "remuneration", it is a choice, but Steem is widely criticized as highly centralized, and suspiciously resembles a Ponzi system.
PeerTube is free, decentralized, distributed, and does not impose any remuneration model. This is the choice we have made, which is debatable, and others (like d.tube) have made other choices, which have their advantages. So it's up to you to see what suits you.
-
"IPFS is a great technology, but it still seems very (too!) young for large scale streaming of large files."
Myslim ze jestli je technologie mlada nebo stara neni rozhodujici, spis pro "large scale streaming of large files" bude tak jako tak potreba " large scale hardware and bandwidth" a je jedno jestli se to nazene mnozstvim peeru po zemekouli anebo blackboxama nekde v datacentru, kazdopadne cistej P2P v dobe kdy je spousta uzivatelu zahrabana za devatero NATy a priskrcovana od vlastniho ISP vsemoznymi FUPy, nevidim prilis ruzove....
Tim spis ze v USA si ted odsouhlasili ze si zariznou sitovou neutralitu takze nebude trvat dlouho a US triopol zacne skrtit "vybrane" pakety (tak jak uz byl drive nekolikrat pristizen)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/07/29/using_a_vpn_to_watch_netflix_on_fios_keeps_verizon_from_throttling.html?via=gdpr-consent...coz bylo duvodem proc Netflix SAM nabidnul svym abonentum speedtest: https://fast.com/ aby videli co dostavaj od svyho ISP "za kvalitu"
Jinak IPFS je skutecne technologie s velkym potencialem a uz ted streamuje dost dobre, ba co vic zda se ze dost dobre prochazi i beznym NATem, viz tohle demovideo:
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmVc6zuAneKJzicnJpfrqCH9gSy6bz54JhcypfJYhGUFQu/play#/ipfs/QmTKZgRNwDNZwHtJSjCp6r5FYefzpULfy37JvMt9DwvXse
je streamovany od vice seedu, ale tohle:
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmUTVtNop2T6DRhHpKXaK9iauPiMCvdwTThTRTbNfc1CXi
je streamovana z domaciho Atom CPU serveru, aniz by bylo nutny otevirat porty ve firewallu.Se statickym obsahem, anebo s MP3 problemy nejsou zadny:
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmSM2zCHaGsgk1n9GyEuyjTmoEj8sKFn7AVpG7mZRoGZdN/6.cutSN562-%20SQRL%20explained.mp3https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmVLDAhCY3X9P2uRudKAryuQFPM5zqA3Yij1dY8FpGbL7T
Tady je mozny se dozvedet vic: https://ipfs.io/media/
-
IPFS Alpha | Why We Must Distribute The Web
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skMTdSEaCtAThe next Internet Revolution | Juan Benet | TEDxSanFrancisco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RCwZDRwk48
