Clovek by pred rokem nerekl jak zavazny dopad bude tohle prolomeni MD5 mit. Treba v Australii se soudil ridic s policajtama o snimek jeho rychle jizdy porizeny digitalni kamerou se znamou MD5 sumou. Tvrdil ze mohl byt upraven aniz by se MD5 zmenilo a ... vyhral! Pokutu zaplatit nemusel protoze policajti nemohli dokazat ze snimek neupravili :-)
Pisou tam, ze policajti nebyli schopni nalezt experta, ktery by dokazal, ze se se snimkem od porizeni nic nestalo a proto to ten clovek vyhral. Nic o MD5 tam neni.
The case revolved around the integrity of a mathematical MD5 algorithm published on each picture and used as a security measure to prove pictures have not been doctored after they have been taken....
Mate pravdu, on jim nejede reklamni server, takze mi to tu zpravu urizlo za timhle odstavcem:
"The integrity of all speed camera offences has been thrown into serious doubt and it appears that the RTA is unable to prove any contested speed camera matter because of a lack of admissible evidence," Mr Miralis said.