Minimalne castecne jsem se mylil. Posledni 3 obvineni parizskeho soudu jsou:
"- Providing cryptology services aiming to ensure confidentiality without certified
declaration,
- Providing a cryptology tool not solely ensuring authentication or integrity
monitoring without prior declaration,
- Importing a cryptology tool ensuring authentication or integrity monitoring
without prior declaration."
Primarne o sifrovane komunikaci to neni, ale soucasti obvineni je.
No, ale zjevne to obvineni nejakou oporu v zakone taky ma. A zjevne se to obvineni toci kolem toho, ze formalne nebyly splneny nejake povinnosti ulozene timto zakonem.