Vlákno názorů k článku
Watermarking u Claude Code je tu od pc2005 - Bude se ten watermarking přidávat i do vygenerovaného...

Bude se ten watermarking přidávat i do vygenerovaného zdrojáku? :-D

To tam přidávají od začátku ne? :-)

treba do komentaru ke kodu, nebo do nazvu promennych.

int tohle_vygenero­vala_ai_1_pro_u­zivatele_fran­ta = 666;

Zprávička obsahuje odkaz přímo na oznámení Anthropicu, kde tohle taky řeší. Tady citace:
_____________­________________________­_________
What about code?

As we noted above, AI watermarking takes advantage of decisions where either choice of a word would be equally good. Where an exact output is required—where there isn’t a choice, and something would be factually wrong or a piece of code would break if a different term was chosen—the watermark isn’t applied.

For example, once the model has written “2 + 2 =”, there is a very clear best choice for the next token (if the model is completing the sum, there isn’t an answer that’s equally as good as “4”; if it’s talking about George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, there isn’t an answer that’s equally as good as “5”). The “nudge” of the watermark wouldn’t be applied here. For the same reason, code—which in very many cases has to be exact—has generally less watermarking than some other forms of text.

Having said that, in areas where there is an arbitrary choice between particular words or terms within the code, the watermark can be used, such as comments within code. But by definition, it will have a negligible effect on the actual code produced.